Concerns Surrounding COVID-19 Vaccine Shedding: A Critical Analysis by Dr. Jame Thorp. Urgent Call for Eminent Scientist and Experts like Dr. Paul Alexander and Dr. Aranda to Review Critical Issues
In a recent post authored by Dr. James Thorp, a notable figure in the medical community, a discussion ensues regarding the potential phenomenon of shedding linked to COVID-19 vaccines. The post, which gained traction across various platforms, introduces a list of research colleagues with assigned hashtags, notably highlighting Tiffany Parotto as the Founder of MyCycleStory, setting the stage for the subsequent discourse.
Commencing with commendations towards the mentioned authors, particularly emphasizing Tiffany Parotto, Dr. Thorp underscores the scientific evidence presented as highly credible. There's an implied gravity to this evidence, suggesting it as a potential "smoking gun" for elucidating phenomena leading to severe menstrual abnormalities in unvaccinated women. The author expresses legitimate concerns regarding the broader implications of shedding, speculating on the substances that might be shed, referencing studies on mRNA in breast milk and the spike protein. [In the updated post, the author reiterates the esteemed status of research colleagues, including the hashtags. The emphasis on Tiffany Parotto's commendation is maintained, and the scientific evidence is once again praised as beyond reproach. The author connects this evidence to a potential "smoking gun" for shedding and severe menstrual abnormalities in unvaccinated women, speculating on the substances shed.]
As the narrative progresses, Dr. Thorp delves deeper into his concerns about the potential consequences of shedding, drawing attention to reported injuries or deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. A wide array of serious health issues, including reproductive complications, autoimmune disorders, and neurological injuries, are highlighted. Of particular note is the suggestion that shedding may not only affect the unvaccinated but also pose risks to the vaccinated population.
The mention of Dr. Paul Elias Alexander and Dr. Aranda in the text appears to seek a response to the situation described. Dr. Thorp may be inviting opinions or actions from these individuals regarding the concerns raised about shedding, the proposed global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccines, and potential ethical issues with the ICMJ journal. [In the updated post, the author mentions Dr. Paul Elias Alexander and Dr. Aranda, suggesting an inquiry into their perspectives on the shedding phenomenon, the call for a global moratorium, and the potential issues with the ICMJ journal.] It suggests a desire for these individuals to express their views or take a position on the matters raised by the author.
A critical aspect of the discussion revolves around the call for a global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccines, endorsed by the 13 authors. Dr. Thorp raises valid criticisms directed at the ICMJ journal, questioning its integrity and ethics. Doubts are raised about compromising agreed-upon language in the submitted work and whether the authors will resist any unethical demands from the journal. This section expresses skepticism about the ethical standards of the journal and the potential repercussions on the credibility of the authors' work.
In the final segment, Dr. Thorp highlights concerns about the potential use of coercive tactics among the 13 authors to achieve consensus, questioning the ethics of such an approach. References are made to tactics employed by governmental agencies, hospital systems, and media against medical freedom fighters, indicating unease about adopting similar methods within the medical community. Furthermore, doubts are raised about the involvement of five authors affiliated with @RobertKennedyJr's Children’s Health Defense (CHD), suggesting concerns about compromising the initially agreed-upon language. Questions linger about the organization's functionality and ethics, particularly regarding its promises of reforming governmental agencies captured by the pharmaceutical industry.
In conclusion, Dr. Thorp calls upon readers to remain vigilant and attentive to unfolding events, leaving an open-ended question about the potential impact on the medical community and the promises made by @RobertKennedyJr's Children’s Health Defense. This comprehensive analysis invites readers to contemplate the complexities surrounding COVID-19 vaccine shedding and its broader implications. [In the updated post, this concern about potential fascist tactics among the 13 authors is retained. The author expresses worry about the involvement of five authors affiliated with @RobertKennedyJr's Children’s Health Defense (CHD), suggesting a strong-arming influence to compromise the initially agreed-upon language. Doubts are raised about the organization's functionality and ethics, questioning its ability to fulfill promises of reforming governmental agencies captured by the pharmaceutical industry.]
[The text concludes with a call for readers to stay tuned, leaving an open-ended question about how the situation will unfold and its potential impact on the medical community and the promises made by @RobertKennedyJr's Children’s Health Defense.] [In the updated post, the author reiterates the call for readers to stay tuned, leaving an open-ended question about how the situation will unfold and its potential impact on the medical community. There's an additional hope expressed that Mr. Kennedy will clean out CHD, suggesting a desire for organizational reform. The readers are encouraged to be the judge and stay tuned for further developments.]